Skip to content
HummingReadStories that grow with you.

The science

The science behind our readers

Every HummingRead reader is built on well-established findings about how children learn to read: the right level of difficulty, a story short enough to finish in one sitting, and support that fades as the reader grows. This page explains each choice and the research behind it.

The right level of difficulty

A child’s reading level is set by how hard the words and sentences are, not by how long the story is. Children understand a story well when they already know nearly all of its words and can read its sentences without strain.

Every HummingRead band has a readability target that controls sentence length and word difficulty. New words that matter to the story appear in context first, then in a short Words to Know box, so a child meets them with support rather than getting stuck.

One reader, one sitting

Each reader is sized to fill about two printed pages at its band’s type size. With its checks and talk questions, it fits a single 40-minute reading lesson.

Grade and age, and words per reader, at each band
BandGrade and ageWords per reader
PurplePre-K to K · ages 4–5about 350
YellowGrades 1–3 · ages 6–8about 550
GreenGrades 4–6 · ages 9–11about 800
BlueGrades 7–9 · ages 12–14about 1,000
RedGrades 10–12 · ages 15–17about 1,100
SilverFirst-year university · adultabout 1,500

Why one sitting matters:

Longer books come as a series.

A long novel becomes a series of episodes, each about the length of a single reader at that band and each ending where the story breaks. Together they tell the whole story: its characters, suspense, turning points and ending.

Why serials are short at Purple

A long book comes to the shelf as a serial, and the serial is capped: six episodes at Purple, eight at Yellow, twelve at Green. From Blue up a book runs as long as its chapters. The caps follow what a young reader can hold from one sitting to the next.

Working memory grows steadily through the primary years (Gathercole, Pickering, Ambridge & Wearing, 2004), so a five-year-old carries less of last week’s episode into this one than a nine-year-old does. What a child remembers of a story is its chain of causes — what led to what — more than its length (Trabasso & van den Broek, 1985); so every later episode opens with a recap that restates that chain in a few lines, and a Purple cliffhanger is one question a child can hold overnight. And the point of a serial is the habit: how much a child reads and is read to predicts language and reading growth (Mol & Bus, 2011), so a serial is sized to be finished. Six sittings at Purple is a fortnight of bedtimes.

A first meeting with the great stories

A HummingRead reader is a child’s first meeting with a great story, not a replacement for the original. By twelve, a child can have met dozens of great stories, and when they are ready for a full novel, they already know which ones they love.

Every reader’s About page names the original work and its author, and says when it was first published. Meet the great stories early. Read the originals when you’re ready.

What surrounds the story

Type size and spacing

Young readers read faster and make fewer errors with larger, well-spaced type, so HummingRead’s type and spacing are set for each band, following the research below: largest for the youngest readers, stepping down as they grow. On screen, readers can enlarge the text.

Sources

  1. Hughes, L. & Wilkins, A. (2000). Typography in children’s reading schemes may be suboptimal. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(3).
  2. Wilkins, A. et al. (2009). Typography for children may be inappropriately designed. Journal of Research in Reading.
  3. Katzir, T., Hershko, S. & Halamish, V. (2013). The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: bigger is not always better. PLoS ONE, 8(9).
  4. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190.
  5. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630.
  6. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296.

The six reading bands·How a reader is made